1) The idea this is a conservation movie is kind of laughable. The main conflict is man v society, not man v nature, and the use of positive natural forces is... forced.
2) The treatment of PEOPLE is terrible in this movie. We blow things up, we erase memories, we are just straight up elitist. But with the wave of a wand all damage is undone.
3) The lack of explaining ANYTHING is horrific. Apparition is CONSTANT, and never explained, Wands are just presumed (especially the apparent horror of the snapped wand which like ???), the interior of the briefcase is BONKERS but also we spend very little time there?
4) The political themes are clumsy and heavy handed, especially due to the fact that they're WIZARDS. Wizards. Have. Magic. They are BORN different. They are almost not human. You cannot address humanity's propensity to be terrible to each other based on how they treat aliens/humans. This is a fallacy.
4) The political themes are clumsy and heavy handed, especially due to the fact that they're WIZARDS. Wizards. Have. Magic. They are BORN different. They are almost not human. You cannot address humanity's propensity to be terrible to each other based on how they treat aliens/humans. This is a fallacy.
5) Newt is an obvious self insert. He's painfully smart, he causes all the plot, he's incredibly smug and *infallible*, he saves the AUROR. Jesus the treatment of Emily in this movie is diabolical. She's consistently shown not as frustrated by the system, but a servant to it.
6) Finally, they're all better main characters. Newt is an interesting and unique character, but he's hard to identify with. It'd be like if Hermione narrated the Sorceror's Stone.
Emily can follow a typical cop arch and play into the crime tropes of it.
6) Finally, they're all better main characters. Newt is an interesting and unique character, but he's hard to identify with. It'd be like if Hermione narrated the Sorceror's Stone.
Emily can follow a typical cop arch and play into the crime tropes of it.
Kowalski is a straight man and can follow the fantasy arch of learning, SLOWLY, dear god, about all these wondrous things before he (maybe? please?) had some sort of impact on the climax.
7) This sucks. It all sucks, it's clumsy as a social metaphor, it's lazy as a fantasy film, it's confused as a visual oddment, it's boring as a crime story, and it's disappointing as a Harry Potter EU exploration.
Please don't see Fantastic Beasts. I mean, you probably will, but brace yourself for a heaping pile of garbage.
7) This sucks. It all sucks, it's clumsy as a social metaphor, it's lazy as a fantasy film, it's confused as a visual oddment, it's boring as a crime story, and it's disappointing as a Harry Potter EU exploration.
Please don't see Fantastic Beasts. I mean, you probably will, but brace yourself for a heaping pile of garbage.
*************Spoilers***********************
1) We just murder Creedence. No care WHATSOEVER to the fact a kid died. "oh, he was sick" is pretty weak imo. We're promised Newt or Graves (AKA Grindelwald, who is essentially Voldemort but less persistent) will save him. Two very smart, capable wizards aren't enough to save an innocent life. That's a fundamentally despairing message.